11
Sep
By Barry Herman
On September 9, 2009, ALJ E. James Gildea issued the public version of Order No. 25 in Certain Cold Cathode Fluorescent Lamp Inverter Circuits and Products Containing the Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-666).  In the Order, ALJ Gildea granted Complainants’ O2 Micro International Ltd. and O2 Micro Inc. (collectively, “O2 Micro”) and Respondents’ LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG Display America, Inc.’s (collectively, “LGD”) joint motion seeking termination of the investigation with respect to LGD.  The motion was based on a consent order stipulation (“Stipulation”).

According to the Order, O2 Micro and LGD stated that there were no other agreements between O2 Micro and LGD concerning the subject matter of the investigation and argued that termination “would pose no threat to the public interest” and would result in “conservation of the parties’ time and resources.”  The Commission Investigative Staff supported the motion stating that the stipulation “provides an acceptable basis on which to terminate this investigation…” and that the termination “would not be contrary to the public interest.”

In granting the motion, ALJ Gildea found that the Stipulation presented by O2 Micro and LGD complied with the requirements of the Commission’s rules.  Noting that “termination of litigation under these circumstances as an alternative method of dispute resolution is generally in the public interest,” ALJ Gildea granted the motion to terminate the investigation with respect to LGD.
Share



Copyright © 2019 Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.