Archive for April 20th, 2009

ALJ Charneski Orders That Respondent Need Not Provide Deposition Testimony On Unasserted Claim In Certain Semiconductor Integrated Circuits (337-TA-648)

Monday, April 20th, 2009

On April 16, 2009, ALJ Carl C. Charneski issued the public version of Order No. 48 (dated March 11, 2009) in Certain Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Using Tungsten Metallization and Products Containing Same (337-TA-648).  In the Order, ALJ Charneski denied Complainants LSI Corporation’s and Agere Systems Inc.’s (“LSI”) motion for reconsideration of a ruling he made [...]

ALJ Charneski Denies Motion To Dismiss Complaint In Certain Cast Steel Railway Wheels (337-TA-655)

Monday, April 20th, 2009

On April 16, 2009, ALJ Carl C. Charneski issued the public version of Order No. 20 in Certain Cast Steel Railway Wheels, Certain Processes for Manufacturing or Relating to Same and Certain Products Containing Same (337-TA-655).  According to the Order, ALJ Charneski denied respondent Standard Car Truck Company’s (“SCT”) motion to dismiss complainant Amsted Industries [...]

ALJ Essex Issues Initial Determination Terminating Certain Automotive Parts (337-TA-651) Based On Settlement Agreement

Monday, April 20th, 2009

On April 16, 2009, ALJ Theodore R. Essex issued Order No. 30: Initial Determination Terminating Investigation On The Basis Of Settlement Agreement in Certain Automotive Parts (337-TA-651). According to the Order, on April 3, 2009, complainant Ford Global Technologies, LLC (“Ford”) and respondents LKQ Corporation, Keystone Automotive Industries, Inc., Jui Li Enterprise Co., Y.C.C. Parts [...]

ALJ Luckern Determines That Respondents’ License Agreements Relating To Accused Products Are Not Relevant For Calculating The Appropriate Bond In Certain Video Game Machines (337-TA-658)

Monday, April 20th, 2009

On April 16, 2009, Chief ALJ Paul J. Luckern issued the public version of Order No. 17 in Certain Video Game Machines and Related Three-Dimensional Pointing Devices (337-TA-658).  In the order, ALJ Luckern found respondents Nintendo Co., Ltd. and Nintendo of America, Inc.’s (“Nintendo”) license agreements relating to the accused products are not relevant for [...]

Update Regarding Certain Electronic Devices Having Image Capture Or Display Functionality (337-TA-672)

Monday, April 20th, 2009

Further to our March 26 post, on April 16, 2009, ALJ Carl C. Charneski issued Order No. 4 – setting target date in Certain Electronic Devices Having Image Capture or Display Functionality and Components Thereof (337-TA-672).  In the order, ALJ Charneski set a 16 month target date.  Therefore, the Initial Determination in this investigation will [...]

ALJ Rogers Denies Samsung’s Motion to Amend the Notice of Investigation in Certain Electronic Devices Including Handheld Wireless Communications Devices (337-TA-673)

Monday, April 20th, 2009

On April 16, 2009, ALJ Robert K. Rogers, Jr. issued Order No. 7 denying a motion filed by respondents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLP (“Samsung”) to amend the Notice of Investigation (“Notice”) and limit the scope of the investigation to Certain Camcorders and Wireless Telephones with Keypads.  [...]