Author Archive

ALJ Rogers Issues Initial Determination Granting Google’s Motion To Intervene And Order Denying Motion to Disqualify Counsel in Certain Portable Communication Devices (337-TA-827)

Wednesday, February 15th, 2012

On February 13, 2012, ALJ Robert K. Rogers Jr. issued Order No. 7 granting Google Inc.’s (“Google”) motion to intervene, but denying a motion to disqualify the law firm of Pepper Hamilton LLC (“Pepper Hamilton”) in Certain Portable Communication Devices (337-TA-827). By way of background, the investigation is based on a complaint filed by Digitude [...]

ALJ Essex Issues Initial Determination Granting Default in Certain Protective Cases (337-TA-780)

Monday, February 13th, 2012

On February 9, 2012, ALJ Theodore R. Essex issued Order No. 25 granting Complainant’s motion for entry of default against certain respondents and granting respondent National Cellular’s motion for default in Certain Protective Cases and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-780). By way of background, the investigation is based on a complaint filed by Otter Products, [...]

Federal Circuit Affirms in Ninestar Appeal (2009-1549)

Friday, February 10th, 2012

On February 8, 2012, the Federal Circuit issued a precedential opinion in Ninestar Tech. Co., Ltd., v. ITC (2009-1549).  This was an appeal from the International Trade Commission’s (“Commission”) assessment of a civil penalty against Ninestar Technology Co. Ltd., Ninestar Technology Company Ltd., and Town Sky Inc. (collectively, “Ninestar”) for failure to comply with exclusion [...]

ALJ Bullock Rules On Supplemental Expert Report Motions in Certain Video Game Systems (337-TA-770)

Thursday, February 2nd, 2012

On January 31, 2012, Chief ALJ Charles E. Bullock issued the public version of Order No. 33 (dated January 9, 2012) concerning a motion for leave to serve a supplemental expert report and a motion to strike one of Respondents’ supplemental expert reports filed by the Complainants Creative Kingdoms, LLC and New Kingdoms, LLC (collectively, [...]

ALJ Shaw Denies Motion To Strike Expert Testimony in Certain Gaming and Entertainment Consoles (337-TA-752)

Tuesday, January 31st, 2012

On January 30, 2012, ALJ David P. Shaw issued Order No. 33 concerning a renewed request to strike expert testimony by the Respondent in Certain Gaming and Entertainment Consoles, Related Software, and Components Thereof  (337-TA-752). As described in our January 26, 2012 post, ALJ Shaw recently ruled on several motions in limine filed by Complainants [...]

ALJ Shaw Rules On Motions In Limine in Certain Gaming and Entertainment Consoles (337-TA-752)

Thursday, January 26th, 2012

On January 23, 2012 ALJ David P. Shaw issued the public versions of Order Nos. 31 and 32 (both dated January 6, 2012) concerning motions in limine filed by the Complainants and the Respondent, respectively, in Certain Gaming and Entertainment Consoles, Related Software, and Components Thereof (337-TA-752). By way of background, the investigation is based [...]

ITC Issues Public Version Of Opinion In Certain Video Game Systems And Controllers (337-TA-743)

Tuesday, January 24th, 2012

On January 20, 2012, the International Trade Commission (the “Commission”) issued the public version of its opinion reviewing-in-part and affirming the initial determination of no violation of Section 337 in Certain Video Game Systems and Controllers (Inv. No. 337-TA-743).  By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is Motiva, LLC (“Motiva”) and the Respondents [...]

ALJ Pender Denies Motion to Extend Fact Discovery In Certain Wireless Communication Devices And Systems (337-TA-775)

Thursday, January 19th, 2012

On January 18, 2012, ALJ Thomas B. Pender issued the public version of Order No. 19 (dated January 6, 2012) in Certain Wireless Communication Devices and Systems, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same (337-TA-775).  The Order denied Complainant Linex Technologies, Inc.’s (“Linex”) motion to extend the deadline for completion of fact discovery from November 30, [...]

Kodak Files New 337 Complaint Regarding Certain Electronic Devices

Friday, January 13th, 2012

On January 10, 2012, Eastman Kodak Company (“Kodak”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337. The complaint alleges that Apple, Inc. of Cupertino, California, High Tech Computer Corp. a/k/a HTC Corp. of Taiwan, HTC America, Inc. of Bellevue, Washington, and Exedea, Inc. of Houston, Texas (collectively, the “Proposed [...]

ALJ Bullock Issues Public Version of Initial Determination In Certain Portable Electronic Devices (337-TA-721)

Thursday, January 5th, 2012

On December 21, 2011, Chief ALJ Charles E. Bullock issued the public version of the Initial Determination (“ID”) (dated October 17, 2011) finding no violation of Section 337 in Certain Portable Electronic Devices and Related Software (Inv. No. 337-TA-721). By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is HTC Corporation (“HTC”) and the Respondent is Apple [...]