Archive for the 'Remand Determinations' Category

ALJ Gildea Issues Public Version Of Remand Initial Determination In Certain Coaxial Cable Connectors (337-TA-650)

Wednesday, June 16th, 2010

Further to our May 28 post, on June 15, 2010, ALJ E. James Gildea issued the public version of the Remand Initial Determination (“RID”) (dated May 27, 2010) in Certain Coaxial Cable Connectors and Components Thereof and Products Containing Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-650).
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is John Mezzalingua Associates, [...]

ALJ Gildea Issues Remand Initial Determination In Certain Coaxial Cable Connectors (337-TA-650)

Friday, May 28th, 2010

On May 27, 2010, ALJ E. James Gildea issued a notice regarding a Remand Initial Determination (“RID”) in Certain Coaxial Cable Connectors and Components Thereof and Products Containing Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-650).
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is John Mezzalingua Associates, Inc. d/b/a PPC, Inc. (“PPC”) and the Respondents are Fu Ching [...]

ALJ Luckern Issues Public Version Of Remand Determination In Certain R-134a Coolant (337-TA-623)

Monday, May 10th, 2010

Further to our April 6, 2009 post, on May 3, 2010, Chief ALJ Paul J. Luckern issued the public version of the Remand Determination (“RD”) (dated April 1, 2009) in Certain R-134a Coolant (Otherwise Known as 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane) (Inv. No. 337-TA-623).  Prior to the issuance of the public version of the RD, the Commission determined to [...]

ALJ Charneski Issues Public Version Of Remand Determination In Certain Semiconductor Integration Circuits Using Tungsten Metallization (337-TA-648)

Friday, January 29th, 2010

On January 29, 2010, ALJ Carl C. Charneski issued the public version of the Remand Determination (dated January 14, 2010) in Certain Semiconductor Integration Circuits Using Tungsten Metallization and Products Containing Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-648).
By way of background, the Complainants in this investigation are LSI Corporation and Agere Systems Inc. and the Respondents are Tower Semiconductor, [...]