New 337 Compaints
By Eric Schweibenz and Alex Englehart
|
Jul
26
On July 19, 2017, Wirtgen America, Inc. of Antioch, Tennessee (“Wirtgen”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337.

The complaint alleges that Caterpillar Bitelli SpA of Italy, Caterpillar Prodotti Stradali S.r.L. of Italy, Caterpillar Americas CV of Switzerland, Caterpillar Paving Products, Inc. of Minneapolis, Minnesota, and Caterpillar Inc. of Peoria, Illinois (collectively, “Caterpillar”) unlawfully import into the U.S., sell for importation, and/or sell within the U.S. after importation certain road milling machines and components thereof that infringe one or more claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,644,340 (the ’340 patent), 9,624,628 (the ’628 patent), 9,656,530 (the ’530 patent), 7,530,641 (the ’641 patent), and 7,828,309 (the ’309 patent) (collectively, the “asserted patents”).
Share

Read More

By Eric Schweibenz and Alex Englehart
|
Jul
17
On July 7, 2017, Bioverativ Inc., Bioverativ Therapeutics Inc., and Bioverativ U.S. LLC (collectively, “Bioverativ”)—all of Waltham, Massachusetts—filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337.

The complaint alleges that CSL Behring LLC of King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, CSL Behring GmbH of Germany, and CSL Behring Recombinant Facility AG of Switzerland (collectively, “CSL”) unlawfully import into the U.S., sell for importation, and/or sell within the U.S. after importation certain recombinant Factor IX products that infringe one or more claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,670,475 (the ’475 patent), 9,623,091 (the ’091 patent), and 9,629,903 (the ’903 patent) (collectively, the “asserted patents”).
Share

Read More

By Eric Schweibenz and Alex Englehart
|
Jul
06
On June 30, 2017, 3M Company and 3M Innovative Properties Company (collectively, “3M”)—both of St. Paul, Minnesota—filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337.

The complaint alleges that Amphenol Corp. of Wallingford, Connecticut, Amphenol Interconnect Products Corp. of Endicott, New York, Amphenol Cables on Demand Corp. of Endicott, New York, Amphenol Assemble Technology (Xiamen) Co., Ltd. of China, Amphenol (Xiamen) High Speed Cable Co., Ltd. of China, and Amphenol East Asia Limited (Taiwan) of Taiwan (collectively, “Amphenol”) unlawfully import into the U.S., sell for importation, and/or sell within the U.S. after importation certain shielded electrical ribbon cables and products containing the same that infringe one or more claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,933,333 (the ’333 patent), 9,601,236 (the ’236 patent), and 9,627,106 (the ’106 patent) (collectively, the “asserted patents”).
Share

Read More

By Eric Schweibenz and Alex Englehart
|
Jul
05
On June 28, 2017, Hologic, Inc. of Marlborough, Massachusetts (“Hologic”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337.

The complaint alleges that FujiFilm Corp. of Japan, FujiFilm Medical Systems USA, Inc. of Stamford, Connecticut, and FujiFilm Techno Products Co., Ltd. of Japan (collectively, “FujiFilm”) unlawfully import into the U.S., sell for importation, and/or sell within the U.S. after importation certain x-ray breast imaging devices and components thereof that infringe one or more claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,831,296 (the ’296 patent), 8,452,379 (the ’379 patent), 7,688,940 (the ’940 patent), 7,986,765 (the ’765 patent), and 7,123,684 (the ’684 patent) (collectively, the “asserted patents”).
Share

Read More

By Eric Schweibenz and Alex Englehart
|
Jun
14
On June 8, 2017, Rio Brands, LLC of West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania (“Rio Brands”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337.
 
The complaint alleges that GCI Outdoor, Inc. of Higganum, Connecticut (“GCI”) unlawfully imports into the U.S., sells for importation, and/or sells within the U.S. after importation certain backpack chairs that infringe one or more claims of U.S. Patent No. RE39,022 (the ’022 patent).

Share

Read More

By Eric Schweibenz and Alex Englehart
|
Jun
07
On May 23, 2017, Honeywell International, Inc. of Morris Plains, New Jersey, Hand Held Products, Inc. d/b/a Honeywell Scanning & Mobility of Fort Mill, South Carolina, and Metrologic Instruments, Inc. of Fort Mill, South Carolina (collectively, “Honeywell”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337.

The complaint alleges that The Code Corporation of Draper, Utah and Cortex Pte Ltd. of Singapore (collectively, “Code”) unlawfully import into the U.S., sell for importation, and/or sell within the U.S. after importation certain barcode readers, scan engines, products containing the same, and components thereof that infringe one or more claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,832,725 (the ’725 patent), 8,511,572 (the ’572 patent), 7,148,923 (the ’923 patent), 7,527,206 (the ’206 patent), 8,646,692 (the ’692 patent), and 9,323,969 (the ’969 patent) (collectively, the “asserted patents”).
Share

Read More

By Eric Schweibenz and Alex Englehart
|
May
12
On May 10, 2017, Aqua Shield, Inc. of West Babylon, New York (“Aqua Shield”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337.

The complaint alleges that Inter Pool Cover Team of the Czech Republic, Alukov HZ Spol. S.R.O. of the Czech Republic, Alukov, Spol. S.R.O. of Slovakia, Pool & Spa Enclosures, LLC of Monroe Township, New Jersey, and PoolAndSpa.com of Las Vegas, Nevada (collectively, the “Proposed Respondents”) unlawfully import into the U.S., sell for importation, and/or sell within the U.S. after importation certain pool and spa enclosures that infringe one or more claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,637,160 (the ’160 patent).
Share

Read More

By Eric Schweibenz and Alex Englehart
|
May
11
On May 9, 2017, ARRIS Enterprises LLC of Suwanee, Georgia (“ARRIS”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337.

The complaint alleges that Sony Corp. of Japan, Sony Corp. of America of New York, New York, Sony Electronics Inc. of San Diego, California, Sony Interactive Entertainment, Inc. of Japan, Sony Mobile Communications (USA), Inc. of San Mateo, California, Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC of San Mateo, California, and Sony Interactive Entertainment America LLC of San Mateo, California (collectively, “Sony”) unlawfully import into the U.S., sell for importation, and/or sell within the U.S. after importation certain consumer electronic devices, including televisions, gaming consoles, mobile phones and tablets, and network-enabled DVD and Blu-Ray players that infringe one or more claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,473,858 (the ’858 patent), 6,934,148 (the ’148 patent), 7,113,502 (the ’502 patent), 7,752,564 (the ’564 patent), 8,300,156 (the ’156 patent), and 9,521,466 (the ’466 patent) (collectively, the “asserted patents”).
Share

Read More

By Eric Schweibenz and Alex Englehart
|
May
04
On May 1, 2017, Sony Corp. of Japan, Sony Storage Media Solutions Corp. of Japan, Sony Storage Media Manufacturing Corp. of Japan, Sony DADC US Inc. of Terre Haute, Indiana, and Sony Latin America Inc. of Miami, Florida (collectively, “Sony”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337.

The complaint alleges that Fujifilm Holdings Corp. of Japan, Fujifilm Corp. of Japan, Fujifilm Media Manufacturing Co., Ltd. of Japan, Fujifilm Holdings America Corp. of Valhalla, New York, and Fujifilm Recording Media U.S.A., Inc. of Bedford, Massachusetts (collectively, “Fujifilm”) unlawfully import into the U.S., sell for importation, and/or sell within the U.S. after importation certain magnetic tape cartridges and components thereof that infringe one or more claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,674,596 (the ’596 patent), 6,979,501 (the ’501 patent), and 7,029,774 (the ’774 patent) (collectively, the “asserted patents”).
Share

Read More

By Eric Schweibenz and Alex Englehart
|
Apr
28
On April 28, 2017, Carl Zeiss AG of Germany (“Zeiss”) and ASML Netherlands B.V. of the Netherlands (collectively, “Complainants”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337.

The complaint alleges that Nikon Corp. of Japan, Sendai Nikon Corp. of Japan, Nikon Inc. of Melville, New York, Nikon (Thailand) Co., Ltd. of Thailand, Nikon Imaging (China) Co., Ltd. of China, and PT Nikon Indonesia of Indonesia (collectively, “Nikon”) unlawfully import into the U.S., sell for importation, and/or sell within the U.S. after importation certain digital cameras, software, and components thereof that infringe one or more claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,301,440 (the ’440 patent), 6,463,163 (the ’163 patent), 6,714,241 (the ’241 patent), 6,731,335 (the ’335 patent), 6,834,128 (the ’128 patent), 7,297,916 (the ’916 patent), and 7,933,454 (the ’454 patent) (collectively, the “asserted patents”).
Share

Read More

Next Page