New 337 Compaints
By Eric Schweibenz and Alex Englehart
|
Feb
17
On February 6, 2017, J.S.T. Corporation of Farmington Hills, Michigan (“JST”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337.

The complaint alleges that the following entities (collectively, the “Proposed Respondents”) unlawfully import into the U.S., sell for importation, and/or sell within the U.S. after importation certain electrical connectors, components thereof, and products containing the same that infringe one or more claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,004,766 (the ’766 patent):
Share

Read More

By Eric Schweibenz and Alex Englehart
|
Feb
06
On February 2, 2017, Paice LLC (“Paice”) and the Abell Foundation, Inc. (collectively, “Complainants”)—both of Baltimore, Maryland—filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337.

The complaint alleges that Ford Motor Company of Dearborn, Michigan (“Ford”) unlawfully imports into the U.S., sells for importation, and/or sells within the U.S. after importation certain hybrid electric vehicles and components thereof that infringe one or more claims of Complainants’ U.S. Patent Nos. 7,104,347 (the ’347 patent), 7,237,634 (the ’634 patent), 7,455,134 (the ’134 patent), 7,559,388 (the ’388 patent), and 8,214,097 (the ’097 patent) (collectively, the “asserted patents”).
Share

Read More

By Eric Schweibenz and Alex Englehart
|
Jan
30
On January 26, 2017, Kudelski SA of Switzerland, OpenTV, Inc. of Mountain View, California, Nagra USA, Inc. of San Francisco, California, and Nagravision SA of Switzerland (collectively, “Kudelski”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337.

The complaint alleges that the following entities (collectively, the “Proposed Respondents”) unlawfully import into the U.S., sell for importation, and/or sell within the U.S. after importation certain digital television set-top boxes, remote control devices, and components thereof that infringe one or more claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,345,389 (the ’389 patent), 7,028,327 (the ’327 patent), and 7,725,720 (the ’720 patent) (collectively, the “asserted patents”):
Share

Read More

By Eric Schweibenz and Alex Englehart
|
Jan
27
On January 24, 2017, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. of Sunnyvale, California and ATI Technologies ULC of Canada (collectively, “AMD”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337.
Share

Read More

By Eric Schweibenz and Alex Englehart
|
Jan
12
On December 30, 2016, Lifetime Products, Inc. of Clearfield, Utah (“Lifetime”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337.

The complaint alleges that Russel Brands, LLC d/b/a Spalding of Bowling Green, Kentucky (“Russel”) and Reliable Sports Equipment (Wujiang) Co. Ltd. of China (collectively, the “Proposed Respondents”) unlawfully import into the U.S., sell for importation, and/or sell within the U.S. after importation certain basketball backboard components and products containing the same that infringe one or more claims of Lifetime’s U.S. Patent Nos. 7,749,111 (the ’111 patent), 8,845,463 (the ’463 patent), and 8,852,034 (the ’034 patent) (collectively, the “asserted patents”).
Share

Read More

By Eric Schweibenz and Alex Englehart
|
Jan
03
On December 22, 2016, Nokia Technologies Oy of Finland (“Nokia”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337.

The complaint alleges that Apple Inc. of Cupertino, California (“Apple”) unlawfully imports into the U.S., sells for importation, and/or sells within the U.S. after importation certain electronic devices, including mobile phones, tablet computers, and components thereof that infringe one or more claims of Nokia’s U.S. Patent Nos. 7,415,247 (the ’247 patent), 9,270,301 (the ’301 patent), 6,393,260 (the ’260 patent), 8,036,619 (the ’619 patent), 6,826,391 (the ’391 patent), 6,480,700 (the ’700 patent), 9,473,602 (the ’602 patent), and 7,653,366 (the ’366 patent) (collectively, the “asserted patents”).
Share

Read More

By Eric Schweibenz and Alex Englehart
|
Dec
23
On December 16, 2016, ZiiLabs Inc., Ltd. of Bermuda (“ZiiLabs”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337.

The complaint alleges that the following entities (collectively, the “Proposed Respondents”) unlawfully import into the U.S., sell for importation, and/or sell within the U.S. after importation certain graphics processors, DDR memory controllers, and products containing the same that infringe one or more claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,677,952 (the ’952 patent), 6,950,350 (the ’350 patent), 7,518,616 (the ’616 patent), and 8,643,659 (the ’659 patent) (collectively, the “asserted patents”):
Share

Read More

By Eric Schweibenz and Alex Englehart
|
Dec
22
On December 15, 2016, Sony Corp. of Japan, Sony Storage Media and Devices Corp. of Japan, Sony DADC US Inc. of Terre Haute, Indiana, and Sony Latin America Inc. of Miami, Florida (collectively, “Sony”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337.

The complaint alleges that Fujifilm Holdings Corp. of Japan, Fujifilm Corp. of Japan, Fujifilm Holdings America Corp. of Valhalla, New York, and Fujifilm Recording Media U.S.A., Inc. of Bedford, Massachusetts (collectively, “Fujifilm”) unlawfully import into the U.S., sell for importation, and/or sell within the U.S. after importation certain magnetic tape cartridges and components thereof that infringe one or more claims of Sony’s U.S. Patent Nos. 6,345,779 (the ’779 patent), 6,896,959 (the ’959 patent), 7,016,137 (the ’137 patent), and 7,115,331 (the ’331 patent) (collectively, the “asserted patents”).
Share

Read More

By Eric Schweibenz and Alex Englehart
|
Dec
20
On December 6, 2016, Memory Technologies, LLC of Las Vegas, Nevada (“MTL”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337.

The complaint alleges that SanDisk Corp. of Milpitas, California, SanDisk LLC of Milpitas, California, Western Digital Corp. of Irvine, California, Western Digital Technologies, Inc. of Milpitas, California, SanDisk Limited of Japan, San Disk Storage Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. of Malaysia, and SanDisk SemiConductor (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. of China (collectively, “SanDisk”) unlawfully import into the U.S., sell for importation, and/or sell within the U.S. after importation certain flash memory devices and components thereof that infringe MTL’s U.S. Patent Nos. RE45,542 (the ’542 patent), RE45,486 (the ’486 patent), 7,565,469 (the ’469 patent), 9,063,850 (the ’850 patent), and 8,307,180 (the ’180 patent) (collectively, the “asserted patents”).
Share

Read More

By Eric Schweibenz and Alex Englehart
|
Dec
13
On December 8, 2016, Kent Displays, Inc. of Kent, Ohio (“KDI”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337.

The complaint alleges that Shenzhen Howshow Technology Co., Ltd. d/b/a Shenzhen Howshare Technology Co., Ltd. d/b/a Howshare of China and Shenzhen SUNstone Technology Co., Ltd. d/b/a iQbe of China (collectively, the “Proposed Respondents”) unlawfully import into the U.S., sell for importation, and/or sell within the U.S. after importation certain liquid crystal eWriters and components thereof that infringe KDI’s U.S. Patent Nos. 7,351,506 (the ’506 patent) and 8,947,604 (the ’604 patent) (collectively, the “asserted patents”).
Share

Read More

Next Page